Search for: "MATTER OF F B"
Results 361 - 380
of 9,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2008, 3:54 am
Mar. 06, 2008):A Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction can take one of two forms. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:36 pm
In this Criminal case, the question presented is whether a positive toxicology for marijuana and a respondent mother's admission to prior marijuana use are sufficient to establish neglect pursuant to Family Ct Act § 1012 (f) (i) (B) or § 1046 (a) (iii). [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
Savarese, Lawrence B. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
§ 41.121(b). [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Lipton, John F. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Lipton, John F. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 7:43 am
Morgan further argued that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Juror C then announced that `no matter what happens, my verdict is for guilty. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 10:12 am
Apart from above, amendments in Sections 2(l)(e), 2(l)(f)(iii), 7(4)(b), 8(1) and (2), 9, 11, 12(1), 14(1), 16A, 17(3), 23, 24, 25, 28(3), 31(7)(b), 34 (2A) 37, 48, 56 and in Section 57 are also proposed for making arbitration process more effective.Source: Cached Copy of the PIB Press Release (link). [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:37 am
§ 1132 (a)(1)(B)). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:55 am
Savarese, Wayne Carlin and David B. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm
Patent No. 5,953,740 is drawn to patent ineligiblesubject matter, and therefore its complaintfailed to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure12(b)(6). [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
§ 2000e-5(b), (f). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:03 am
Davis, --- F.3d ----, 2021 WL 97427, Appeal No. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
Fox† and Amanda F. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 12:11 am
§ 1369(b)(1)(F). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
§ 702.243(b), contains the same language…and a bit more. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
As for the administrative portion of a drunk driving matter, the DMV Driver Safety Office does not address drug impairment at the APS Hearing. [read post]
23 May 2019, 2:43 pm
(b) Eligibility under this section shall be determined only while considering the claimed invention as a whole, without discounting or disregarding any claim limitation. [read post]
