Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 361 - 380
of 21,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
OSHA’s final rule revised or implemented eleven provisions in the Construction of Electrical Power Transmission Standard, 29 CFR 1926, subpart V, including provisions regarding: (1) host employers and contractors; (2) training; (3) job briefings; (4) fall protection; (5) insulation and working on or near live parts; (6) minimum approach distances; (7) protection from electric arcs; (8) deenergizing transmission and distribution lines and equipment; (9) protective grounding;… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 6:05 am
Madison, Congress lacks the power to expand the Supreme Court’s “original” jurisdiction (i.e., its power to hear disputes as a matter of first impression). [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
The plainest example is in Georgia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Ultimately, each side’s spin of judicial votes matters little: the only votes that matter are the nine on the Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:05 am
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 4:30 am
Under Article 73, the executive powers of the Union extends to matters with respect to which Parliament has the power to make laws. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
” “[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that gov-ernment has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:29 pm
Washington v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
Only this will serve the relevant separation-of-powers principle. ] Both the Chevron doctrine and West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
Thus Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
Industry Ass’n v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:24 am
"No matter what you may think of the phraseology of Hawaii Insurers Council v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm
The Supreme Court heard telephonic argument on Monday in Salinas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
In 1825, Wayman v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:43 pm
Much of Perry v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:38 pm
(David Bernstein) When we last encountered the Media Matters blog, its authors reacted to a George Will column on Rehabiltating Lochner by declaring that Lochner v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
To begin with, whether Marshall got it right as a matter of original meaning is a matter of considerable dispute (and was at the time he issued the opinion). [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 9:29 am
In BRJM, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:50 am
In doing so, it has provided a powerful statement of the limits of Parliamentary privilege against court interference, and of its own powers in our separation of powers system. [read post]
