Search for: "MATTER OF W L C L B L" Results 361 - 380 of 744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
An attempt was made to interrupt the proceedings under Rule 142(1)(b) EPC  or under Rule 84(2), first sentence, EPC but these were rejected. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm by Matthias Weller
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
       (c)  The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Although Davidoff says that so matter of factly that one might assume the claim is not contestable, in fact it's not at all clear that shareholders have "the ultimate choice of when to sell the company" and its perfectly clear (at least to me) that, as a matter of policy, they should not possess that right. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
Kelley, Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science, Miami University (OH) Harold Hongju Koh, Dean and Gerard C. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Robert Liles
§ 3729-3733(1)(A)-(D), the government can use a Civil Investigative Demand to require a person: (A) to produce such documentary material inspection and copying, (B) to answer in writing written interrogatories with respect to such documentary material or information, (C) to give oral testimony concerning such documentary material  or information, or (D) to furnish any combination of such material, answers, or testimony. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Matter of Mia S v Michelle C,, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2022 WL 17480834, 2022 N.Y. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
In fact, Rule 26(b)(1) describes the scope of allowable discovery as follows: ‛Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action… . [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Under (a), (b) and (c) the analysis was correctly determined as to whether a payment can be made to or for the settlor. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Togus Reg’l Office, Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 294 F. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
However, in her reply brief, with one sentence, she argues that "[c]learly there was serious artistic value. [read post]