Search for: "Mark Case" Results 361 - 380 of 70,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2016, 5:51 am
In such a case, where there was no need for intermediation via a mark as to source, genericness would have a positive role, because it would provide information about what type of product was being offered.Something similar is going on with the “Men’s Store”. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:15 am by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton
Attorney Mark Tarallo will present the basics of an M&A transaction from start to finish in tomorrow’s Mergers & Acquisitions 101 provided by MyLawCLE. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:04 am by Neil Wilkof
Peter writes as follows: The Supreme Court of Austria (Oberster Gerichtshof) recently rendered a remarkable (to this blogger) decision on the interpretation of Art. 58(1)(c) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR) in the context of how indications of tradition (in this case "since 1875") are perceived by the relevant public. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:09 pm by Manpreet Singh Sood
" Answered in affirmative PiracyHeld that in such cases there is no purpose in ordering accounts against persons dealing in piracy, no accounts are kept of such sales. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Woodrow Pollack
Wham-O, Inc. case -- another false marking case -- is still pending before the Federal Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm by Ron Coleman
The post Trademark parodies and iconic marks: can foul become fair? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:25 am by Noric Dilanchian
After a 10 year gap in trade mark cases, the High Court of Australia delivered two trade mark decisions in December 2009. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
The Gallo case raises the fundamental issue of what is “use as a trade mark”. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:19 am by tracey
“A legal anomaly that continues to cause injustice may be preventing an inquest into Mark Duggan’s death.” Full story The Guardian, 29th March 2012 Source: www.guardian.co.uk   [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
Bruce Winston case, which was decided on July 9. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 10:43 am by Eleonora Rosati
If that was the case, then the Charter could offer a suitable legal basis for a more harmonized approach to the exercise of rights (including those jointly owned), well beyond the realm of trade mark law. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:34 am by Stacy
Nautilus, Inc., the Western District of Virginia ruled that a false marking plaintiff could proceed with its case under state consumer protection laws, including laws governing unfair competition and false advertising, and that such claims were not preempted by the federal patent laws. [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:40 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sal Herman of Hold Up Suspender won his patent marking case, but he considers the case a holdup:"I was not victorious in a sense, because it cost me $80,000. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:05 am by DBL Law
Name Mark Guilfoyle In which office are you located? [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:55 am by Legal Talk Network
In this second episode on case framing, legendary trial lawyer Mark Mandell drills down on how to select your most important issues, anticipate the attack and apply decision science in your courtroom strategy. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
YouTube ScreenshotThere is an interesting ruling in the ongoing litigation of the case of Mark McCloskey. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm by Riana Harvey
A few weeks back, this Kat wrote an article about a case which relied on the UK law of passing off in a UK trade mark infringement claim. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
(e) The overriding objective applies to proceedings before the Registrar including the obligation to deal with cases justly. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:34 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of summary judgment to the defendant a legal malpractice case Nancy Lemen (Lemen) and her husband Mark (Mark) (collectively the Lemens) entered into a retainer agreement with Kevin L. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:08 am by The Docket Navigator
"[A]lthough Defendant has asserted potentially plausible arguments that he lacked the requisite intent for liability under § 292, these assertions go to the merits of the false marking claim, which the Court is in no position to prejudge as of this early stage of the case. [read post]