Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
If a Kat wishes to repeat the experience of getting a particular type of [plant-based dairy substitute] cream, a distinctive mark will enable her to pick the same one out in future. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm
(opinion by Judge Mark Seidl, joined by Judges Lisa Stark and Thomas Hruz): Wis. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Zagaris reviewed Mark Pieth’s book on gold laundering. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Zagaris reviewed Mark Pieth’s book on gold laundering. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
Here’s wishing everyone well over the festive season. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:09 am
Don writes about a high school band in California that wished to include Ave Maria by little-known German composer Franz Biebl in one of its concerts. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Some commentators have cautioned reformers to be careful of what they wish for. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
(Gömböc Kutató v Szellemi Tulajdon, Court of Justice of the EU, Case C‑237/19 (April 2020))While shape trade marks comprise less than 0.5% of all EU trade marks applied for ever, us trade mark lawyers do enjoy talking about them an awful lot. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:39 am
The decision in Singapore by Principal Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, Anne Loo (“PAR”), in Discovery Communications, LLC v A-Star-Education Discovery Camps Pte. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
Los Angeles v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Marks v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:24 pm
From Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
Unites States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
This is important because if the marks are not held to be similar, there can be no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
This is important because if the marks are not held to be similar, there can be no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
