Search for: "Marketing King, Inc."
Results 361 - 380
of 882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 29 [week ending Sunday 11 January] -- Martin Luther King’s movie ‘Selma’ and copyright problems | CJEU’s copyright decisions awaited in 2015 | The Modern Law of Patents reviewed | China becoming a ‘protector’ of patent rights | ‘Je suis charlie’ trade mark in France and OHIM| UK IPO logo’s licensing system | High Court for… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
In Quality King Distributors, Inc. v L'anza Research Int'l, Inc., the Supreme Court held in 1998 that §602(a)(1), which refers to §106(3)'s exclusive distribution right, incorporates the "first sale" doctrine limitation. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/whbhdTFbwf -> Compute… http://t.co/jHIN2ha9cG -> Red Tape Week: Anti-spam legislation, CASL a big culprit http://t.co/Ui3TQc4Qfx -> King of the CASL: CRTC Chairman shares Paperweight crown – Canada NewsWire (press release) http://t.co/YamMEjXyvJ -> On Martin Luther King, Jr. http://t.co/6c795vGSzL -> Federal Private Sector: Not just one regulator anymore? [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:09 am
The firm handles mainly mid-market deals. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Anyway, here they are:* A film about Martin Luther King without King's actual words: is it really a copyright problem? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm
Cir. 2004), quoting Allied Colloids Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
As for Connecticut, the Board applied the Weiner King factors (Weiner King, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am
The Inclusive Community Project, Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
June 10 – Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Opposer’s products account for about 13% of the U.S. market. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 11:28 am
., Inc., the makers of ARM & HAMMER™ Baking Soda, have been a fixture in your home. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:12 am
Justice Demarest’s decision, after summarizing the testimony and party contentions, concluded that “there is no evidentiary basis to dispute the conclusions of both experts who testified that Maribelle’s Inc., a/k/a Mary’s Bar, has no market value. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
After the news of two of Europe's leading judges lending their support to the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal (who have asked the EPO's Administrative Council to curb the interference by the President in their work), further support arrives from additional national IP judges, all of whom also serve as external members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, explains Merpel* BREAKING NEWS: EPO Communique -- Boards of Appeal "independent in principle"; "precautionary"… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 10:17 am
"But if you look at the marketing so far, I don't think that's the message that comes across. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Oh yes — King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
In February 2010, appellants filed a petition to confirm that 3,017 shares of stock in Medco Health Solutions, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
In February 2010, appellants filed a petition to confirm that 3,017 shares of stock in Medco Health Solutions, Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
King-Washington v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
DJO Global, Inc., __ F. [read post]
