Search for: "Marks v. USA" Results 361 - 380 of 1,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
I was gambling in Havana; I took a little risk: Pernod Ricard USA LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, William Koski discusses Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm by Andrew Hamm
Mark Walsh provided a “view” from the Courtroom. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
  Although she seldom gets to go home to celebrate it, she makes a point of marking the day. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm
On Tuesday the newest appointee as a specialist Patents Court judge for England and Wales, Mr Justice Arnold, delivered a major trade mark infringement and passing off judgment in Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:42 am
Moke USA, LLC, Opposition No. 91233014 (April 21, 2020) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
Ltd., Serial No. 75912958 [Section 2(d) refusal of GOLDEN EAGLE for "coffee; tea; coffee, cocoa or tea based beverages," in light of the identical mark registered for restaurant services and carry-out restaurant services].April 17, 2007 - 2 PM: Wrangler Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:48 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am by war
International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Mark Lunney (King's College London, UK)9. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:27 am
This is reminiscent of the Singapore Registry's decision in USA Pro IP Limited v Montfort Services Sdn. [read post]