Search for: "Materials Co., Ltd." Results 361 - 380 of 1,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 6:43 am
On the two actions based on serious human rights violations, the revocation of exclusion (Texwinca Holdings Ltd) was the result of the winding up of the offending subsidiary. [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
However, the materials and arguments presented by Mr Schwisberg do no more than suggest that something may be lost in a video conferenced hearing. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome was reversal of CD California:Spigen Korea Co., Ltd., appeals the decision of theUnited States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment of invalidity of threeasserted design patents. [read post]
  The Court, instead, looked to an older House of Lords judgment, Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Salaam [2002] UKHL 48 (“Dubai Aluminium”), in order to consider the test “afresh”. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The case in question, 3 Corporate Services Pte Ltd v Grabtaxi Holdings Pte Ltd [2020], was recently commented on its merits in the IPKat. [read post]