Search for: "Matter of David H." Results 361 - 380 of 1,449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has alleged that David Pecker, CEO of the company that publishes the National Enquirer, attempted to blackmail him by threatening to publish explicit photos of him. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Judges Judith Rogers, David Tatel and Thomas Griffith reviewed Abd Al Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri’s (“Al-Nashiri”) request for a writ of mandamus and prohibition directing the vacatur of the orders convening the military commission which tried him. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Some cases, though, do involve alleged libels on public matters, or even of public officials, police officers, or probation agents (30% in the most comprehensive analysis, David Pritchard's 1991-2007 Wisconsin study). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 11:19 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The AMI payment was the product of a meeting in which Trump was in the room with Cohen and AMI President David Pecker. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Mischon de Reya Data Matters Blog has a post considering the potential breaches of data protection legislation engaged in the incident. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
They even joined with Democrats in passing an anti-nepotism bill, with Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell intoning, “We would have passed this bill no matter who won in 2016. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
But perhaps the most perplexing question, even after deciding that we should be willing to sacrifice for future generations, is how to decide what issues will matter to future generations. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Fighting words include" 'those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction ....'" There is nothing in the record to support, when respondent made any of the foregoing statements, he did so in a situation where it was "inherently likely to provoke violent reaction," considering he made the statements on the internet, in a public forum, far removed… [read post]