Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings" Results 361 - 380 of 1,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Clinton’s impeachment, there was no dispute that he had committed the federal crime of lying under oath to a grand jury. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
District Judge in Mississippi who had been criminally convicted—of making false statements to a federal grand jury—and sentenced to prison. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
Also in the US,a  Grand Theft Auto V 'cheat maker' was been ordered to pay $150,000 in copyright damages: Rockstar Games' parent company Take-Two Interactive won a default judgment against the developer of the GTA V cheat maker "Elusive". [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The subpoena seeks “a wide variety of financial records dating from January 1, 2011 to the present and relating to the President, the Trump Organization, and several related entities” as part of an ongoing state grand-jury proceeding. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:05 am by SHG
There’s nothing Speaker Nancy Pelosi can do to stop him.* Consider the case of a prosecutor armed with a grand jury indictment who learns that the fix is in and that the jury poised to consider the case is about to violate its oath to do impartial justice. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
The grand jury grows out of suspicions about how the President may have used his business firms in transactions designed to help him get elected. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:08 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
James Rogan and approved on a party-line vote, added language to the article concerning Bill Clinton’s false statements to the grand jury. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
In response to Goldsmith, Benjamin Wittes argued first that Goldsmith’s argument would lead to an absurd conclusion: If the clear statement rule applied to the perjury statute, which also doesn’t by its terms apply to the president, the president could lie to a grand jury, which would have “come as a surprise to Bill Clinton. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am by Marty Lederman
Vance is the least significant of the cases because the information Mazars provides to the grand jury will almost certainly stay in the grand jury:  Just as under federal law, New York law mandates strict secrecy with respect to matters and information before a grand jury. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The country is in the midst of impeachment proceedings against a president for the third time in modern history. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Vance The District Attorney of New York County Cyrus Vance has issued a grand jury subpoena to Mazars USA LLP seeking “a wide variety of financial records dating from January 1, 2011 to the present and relating to the President, the Trump Organization, and several related entities” as part of an ongoing state grand-jury proceeding. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
Before you enter an intersection after the light has turned green for you, take a second after the light changes and look both ways before proceeding. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Jonathan Holbrook
What impact does the grand jury’s verdict have on the underlying case? [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
The proceedings below The Vance case arises out of a subpoena issued by New York County (Manhattan) District Attorney Cyrus Vance to Mazars for financial records as part of an ongoing state grand-jury proceeding that, as the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 pm by Jeremy Saland
Rodriguez, the evidence before the Grand Jury established that that the defendant called the victim over to his car where he was seated before asking the complainant for directions to a hospital (generally considered a reasonable inquiry). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 10:44 am by Steve Lubet
There is no Sixth Amendment right either to witness confrontation or a public hearing at the grand jury stage, where the proceedings are secret according to statute. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-433Issues: (1) Whether, when a defendant makes false statements to a United States Attorney’s Office in an effort to persuade that office to decline prosecution, the objective institutional relationship of that office with the grand jury satisfies the “nexus” required for obstruction or attempted obstruction of a grand jury proceeding under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Bottom line is that while there is a grand jury proceeding in state court that is dealing with these possible criminal acts, the federal court has authority to take up the issues raised in this case. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
Even under the prevailing doctrine within the executive branch, there are a number of reasons that an assertion of privilege would be difficult in the context of an impeachment inquiry (which may be why the administration has so forcefully denied that the House’s current inquiries actually constitute impeachment proceedings). [read post]