Search for: "Matter of Kent" Results 361 - 380 of 1,547
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
Kent Newmyer, John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court (2007). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Kent Scheidegger on Crime & Consequences looks at the consequence of replacing Kennedy in criminal cases; he does “not expect that the Kennedy-Whomever succession will come close on the Richter Scale to the Marshall-Thomas succession on matters of criminal law. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 am by The Murray Law Firm
Lee was transported to Bayhealth Kent General Hospital, where he tragically succumbed to fatal injuries. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 am by Kayliegh Crumb
No matter the career, you must properly read nonverbal cues and present your information effectively. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 am by The Murray Law Firm
Lee was transported to Bayhealth Kent General Hospital, where he tragically succumbed to fatal injuries. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
The court of appeals then affirmed, holding that the matter need not be sent to arbitration because “the argument that the claim at hand is within the scope of the arbitration agreement is ‘wholly groundless,’” concluding that there was “no plausible argument that the arbitration applies here” because the lawsuit sought injunctive relief. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Part 2 of this post will be published later this week David Acheson is Lecturer in Media Law at the University of Kent’s Centre for Journalism. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks on the lack of criminal law action in Monday’s Supreme Court opinions and orders. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
We focus instead on the trial judge’s finding that the respondents’ withholding of information they were obliged to disclose in a timely manner was a serious matter warranting a costs sanctions (para 36). [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Stymied in its efforts to undo its Obama-era Browning-Ferris decision, which expanded the definition of “joint employer” and thereby increased potential liability under the NLRA for companies that utilize contingent workforce and franchise arrangements, the NLRB on May 9 announced it was considering resolving the matter through issuance of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” …In the decision, the Board applies long-established principles to find that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law;  and (2) they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” …In the decision, the Board applies long-established principles to find that two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law;  and (2) they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:00 am by Gerry Riskin
Louis, Wake Forest, Cardozo School of Law, Texas A&M, BYU, John Marshall Law School, Florida State, Pace and Chicago-Kent College of Law. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:00 am by Gerry Riskin
Louis, Wake Forest, Cardozo School of Law, Texas A&M, BYU, John Marshall Law School, Florida State, Pace and Chicago-Kent College of Law. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The speech explores the importance of transparency and its practical application to privacy and publicity matters in proceedings involving children. [read post]
27 May 2018, 12:05 pm by Jim Walker
  The most publicized case is that involving a young man on the Pride of Kent who went overboard several years ago. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
Citizens for a Better Environment, the Supreme Court held that federal courts generally may not rule on the merits of a dispute without first determining that it has subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that in Royal v. [read post]