Search for: "Matter of State of New York v David D." Results 361 - 380 of 605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
  And bad news for Arizona in Ryan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
  And bad news for Arizona in Ryan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
The New York Times' John Cushman looks at the "few principal questions the court's ruling will answer. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
In New York City, V and A-Zones have significantly increased under the recently released FEMA maps. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post (subscription required). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Hauben was medical director of risk management strategy for Pfizer, in New York, at the time of publication). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 2254(d) and this Court’s precedent permit federal habeas corpus relief on a claim that a state judge unconstitutionally “coerces” jurors to return a guilty verdict by identifying specific evidence in the case as important and instructing them to consider it? [read post]