Search for: "Melendez"
Results 361 - 380
of 872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Professor Friedman, a true guru of “confrontation” issues notes: It appears that the next case in the Melendez-Diaz line will come very quickly. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:36 am
It appears that the next case in the Melendez-Diaz line will come very quickly. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:06 am
Last year in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:11 pm
Following the Supreme Court decision Melendez-Diaz,129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009), the trial court determined that the testimony of the lab analyst was testimonial, and would normally require the testimony of the analyst that performed the actual test, per the Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm
In an important gloss on its 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
Melendez-Diaz should have made this clear.7. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm
In 2009, in a case called Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who was joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, wrote the majority decision, which reaffirmed the Court 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
It once more assumes for itself a central role in mandating detailed evidentiary rules, thereby extending and confirming Melendez-Diaz’s "vast potential to disrupt criminal procedures. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
New Mexico, the Court narrowly repulsed an attack on Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
"Last year I noted concern that Melendez-Diaz, itself a 5-4 decision, may not survive the replacement of Justice Souter, who was part of the majority in Melendez-Diaz, by Justice Sotomayor (see). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
” Later, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:07 pm
The issue before the court was whether Melendez-Diaz would apply to testimony about such reports. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm
The states that already followed the rule the Supreme Court announced are, in effect, the control group.Tim says (and he's the Michigan expert) that Melendez-Diaz made no difference there. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
Since the most recent sequel, the 5-4 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
New Mexico, the sequel to Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
The decision of the Court is notable in that four justices viewed the result to be governed by the Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Rather each voted in line with her predecessor, preserving the court’s 5–4, formalist-pragmatist split on the Confrontation Clause.In Bullcoming, the Court reaffirmed (and arguably extended) its decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
" Also, under the Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:55 am
The three employees were James Nyema-Davies, Anibal Melendez and Gustavo Tovar. [read post]
