Search for: "Merit Management, Inc.," Results 361 - 380 of 2,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2020, 1:00 am by Peter Ling
Against this background, on September 6, 2019, Fluidigm Corp filed suit against Ionpath Inc. in the NDCA, Case No. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Id., See Office of Personnel Management v. [read post]
Caltrans refused and petitioners filed suit on November 1, 2017, alleging (i) that Caltrans improperly relied on section 103, (ii) that the department is estopped from relying on the 35-day statute of limitations period, and (iii) additional claims on the merits of the adequacy of the FEIR for the project. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am by Cameron Kerry, John B Morris, Jr.
ViSalus, Inc. demonstrates how statutory damages, multiplied by a large number of class-action members, can add up. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
” Nonetheless, on Dec. 30, 2019, Cooper submitted a manuscript of the book to Ellen Knight, a career NSA official who 12 days earlier had become the NSC senior director for records access and information security management—the entity within the NSC that ordinarily conducts classification and prepublication reviews. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Corporate defense lawyers assert that these sacred protections allow corporate executives to manage data security incidents without fear that their words could later be used against them in litigation. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
When Appointment Justified (1)     Multiple issues to be resolved. (2)     Multiple motions to be heard simultaneously. (3)     Present motion is only one in a continuum of many. (4)     The number of documents to be reviewed (especially in issues based on assertions of privilege) make the inquiry inordinately time-consuming. (5)     Referee being appointed to sit in on depositions due to the… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
When Appointment Justified (1)     Multiple issues to be resolved. (2)     Multiple motions to be heard simultaneously. (3)     Present motion is only one in a continuum of many. (4)     The number of documents to be reviewed (especially in issues based on assertions of privilege) make the inquiry inordinately time-consuming. (5)     Referee being appointed to sit in on depositions due to the… [read post]