Search for: "Merrell v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
A state judge and I were attempting to settle large numbers of asbestos cases. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 589 (1993)). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
 Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm by aaronklaw
For example, an Arizona jury awarded a homeowner and his family more than $4 million for a case where the insurance carrier delayed remediating mold contamination (Hatley v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
This guest post was written by David Booth Alden. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
In addition, Havner requires that a plaintiff show ‘that he or she is similar to [the subjects] in the studies’ and that ‘other plausible causes of the injury or condition that could be negated [are excluded] with reasonable certainty’.40” 347 S.W.3d at 265 (quoting from Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958 (3d Cir. 1990); cf. [read post]