Search for: "Michigan Board of Law Examiners"
Results 361 - 380
of 541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2013, 2:38 pm
” For this, “the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board in 2011 reprimanded Almasy, required him to take two classes and fined him $1,200. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am
Ben graduated cum laude from Dartmouth College and magna cum laude from Michigan Law School, where he was an articles editor for the Michigan Law Review. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:31 am
In Michigan, just yesterday, Gov. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:53 am
In Michigan, SCOTUS threw out a law requiring drug testing of welfare recipients in 2003, and a federal court has prevented a similar Florida law passed in 2011 from taking effect until the issue can be litigated. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
In the case of Hostess Brands, the most obviously relevant regulations are those laws which permit or favor "closed shop" rules that force workers to join a union and pay dues (as opposed to states with Right-to-Work laws that prohibit closed shops). [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which hears appeals from federal courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee, has held (correctly, in my opinion) that psychological counseling is a "medical examination" within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which means that an employer cannot require it of a current employee unless it is "job-related and consistent with business necessity. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm
Eleven other people of the more than 150 passengers on board refused treatment further than examinations at the scene. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
(WIMS) Publishers of Michigan Waste Report, REGTrak, WIMS Daily & eNewsUSA Jeff Dauphin, President 767 Kornoelje Dr. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:19 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:37 am
Closer to law school home, Brian Tamanaha’s new book, Failing Law Schools, is a tough and coldly clinical examination of how law schools have become insulated from their students’ economic and professional reality. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:00 am
— from Evil Skippy at Work Carefully Defining “For Cause” Termination in Employment Contract Critical to Avoid Paying for Misconduct — from Jason Shinn’s Michigan Employment Law Advisor Wage & Hour When can an employer fire an employee for medical leave fraud? [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
The fight over the Arizona Immigration Law is the exact reverse of the fight over the healthcare law: the cases are mirror images. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:44 am
According to the University of Michigan’s Monitoring the Future Survey, more than 10 percent of high school seniors in the United States abused narcotics (other than heroin) at least once in their lifetime. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
App.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Michigan et al.Reply of petitioner Coleman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
"Virginia, airports board still at odds over Dulles Rail project" -- Washington Examiner Loudoun County is threatening to pull out of the project that would extend Metro to Washington Dulles International Airport even though it could mean more than $300 million in economic development for the county. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
However, plaintiff is also a party in a seperate matter concerning the Board of Law Examiners denial of his application for admission to the Michigan Bar. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:19 pm
There are multiple legal aspects that might be examined in relation to the Titanic, so I decided to just look at the regulations and requirements that applied to the safety equipment on board, particularly the lifeboats. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
Hosted by Professors Jason Yackee and Alexandra Huneeus A light lunch will be provided starting at 11:45 CLE/EPR Credit Approved by the Wisconsin Board of Bar Examiners No Fee — Same-day registration on site. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
Here’s our Michigan Auto Law Facebook page. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
In Lawrence v Board of Law Examiners, the full Court held that there was no ground to disqualify Justice Markman; Chief Justice Young again did not participate in the decision, and neither did Justice Zahra. [read post]
