Search for: "Miller et al v. Miller" Results 361 - 380 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
“Let’s Not Complicate Things”: Second District Holds Trial Court Properly Exercised Its Discretion In Denying Union’s Permissive Intervention Motion In Complex Los Angeles Port CEQA Litigation
4 Nov 2021, 8:45 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles, et al (China Shipping (North America) Holding Co., Ltd., et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2021) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIR
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Delia Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Petitions to watch | Conference of 04.01.11
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by Christa Culver
Title: Al-Odah v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Teva Pharma. v. Sandoz: SCOTUS finds claim construction subject to de novo OR clear error standard of review
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society - http://jptos.org
Ballot Box Alternatives To CEQA And Land Use Litigation: Recent Developments In The Law Of Initiatives And Referenda
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Wilson, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Court takes no new cases
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Solicitor General for the federal government's views on a significant antitrust case involving drug manufacturers -- Joblove, et al., v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
CAFC in Nantkwest: “[a]ll expenses of the proceedings” under § 145 includes the pro-rata share of the attorneys’ fees the USPTO incurred to defend applicant’s appeal.
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” 10 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practiceand Procedure § 2666 (3d ed. 1998). [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Fourth District Addresses CEQA Baseline Issues In Partially Published Opinion Upholding EIR For Carlsbad Shopping Mall Renovation
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Carlsbad (Plaza Camino Real, LP, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 1, 2015) ____ Cal.App.4th ______, 2015 WL 5895477. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 3 today (and 16 NFP)
20 May 2008, 10:27 am
Stephen Hay, et al. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT - Wayne Tompkins
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
MCNEIL, et al. [read post]
Lethal Injection - http://lethal-injection-florida.blogspot.com/
Obamacare Game Changer: Halbig Win Today Puts Health Care Act At Risk
22 Jul 2014, 9:16 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The suit, Halbig et al v. [read post]
taxgirl - http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/
Second District Upholds Application of CEQA’s Class 3 Categorical Exemption For New Small Structures To City’s Approval of Small Car Wash/Coffee Shop Project, Rejects Appellants’ Attempt To Invoke Unusual Circumstances Exception
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  Steven Walters, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 10 today (and 14 NFP)
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
Carlson, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
Second District Holds Melrose Triangle Project EIR’s Alternatives Analysis and Responses to Comments Comply with CEQA, Upholds City of West Hollywood’s Findings Rejecting Historic Building Preservation Alternative as Infeasible
12 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of West Hollywood (Charles Company, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2017) ____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 3 today (and 9 NFP); Tax Court issues one
6 Oct 2008, 6:48 pm
Jackson, Jr., et al v. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
California Supreme Court Holds CEQA Inapplicable To City’s Adoption Of Qualified Voter Initiative Approving Wal-Mart “Supercenter” Project
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Sue me already” – Analyzing Kanye’s (In)Famous Video (Part III)
12 Jul 2016, 8:54 am by Shelby Bruce (US)
(See Coplans et al., supra, at p. 52.) [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com/
“Sue me already” – Analyzing Kanye’s (In)Famous Video (Part III)
12 Jul 2016, 8:54 am by Shelby Bruce (US)
(See Coplans et al., supra, at p. 52.) [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com
Fourth District Affirms Judgment Upholding City’s Use of CEQA Guidelines’ Historical Resource (Class 31) Exemption To Approve Historic Single Family HomeRehabilitation Project; Holds “Fair Argument” Test Doesn’t Apply ToException Requiring Same Factual Determination As Exemption
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Historic Architecture Alliance, et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Lopsided Attorney-Client Arbitration Agreements: What if client counterclaims under the civil barratry statute? - Comment on Royston v Lopez (Tex. 2015)
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
See The Fredericksburg Care Company L.P. v Juanita Perez et al. [read post]
ADR Law Texas - http://texas-arbitration-case-law.blogspot.com/