Search for: "Mills v. State of Me."
Results 361 - 380
of 385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm
Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am
I have found that a good meme can do as much to make, say, Marbury v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Puts Office at odds with CDN v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
If anyone notes an error or inconsistency in this time line, please let me know, provide better sources, and ask for a correction. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
Amuchastegui's ending reference to Fidel Castro's famous "History Will Absolve Me" provides the proper level of irony to the 2023 assessment. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm
(Mills v Stanway Coaches Ltd [1940] 2 K.B. 334) Such legally fictional characters are normally deployed as part of a process of determining liability after the event, based on ascertained facts involving known individuals, tested and argued through the adversarial court process. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
Years of doing my particular area of law led me to believe that some of my clients who I thought were absolutely the most honest were the most awkward and shifty in the witness box, whereas others who I thought were total rogues came across with great smoothness and self-assurance. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
At minimum, bribery covers not just the taking but the giving of a bribe, and state of mind is key. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
Although Davidoff says that so matter of factly that one might assume the claim is not contestable, in fact it's not at all clear that shareholders have "the ultimate choice of when to sell the company" and its perfectly clear (at least to me) that, as a matter of policy, they should not possess that right. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
In 2007, many of the restrictions had been struck down by a federal judge in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 1:34 pm
Vanderhye v. iParadigms, L.L.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
Think of what the state bars could do if they pooled their resources. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
" Pucci v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
If anyone notes an error or inconsistency in this time line, please contact me, provide better sources, and ask for a correction. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 5:44 am
Take the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:07 pm
Bianca V. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:14 pm
First, I want to point out how congenial some of her perspectives are, even to a liberal like me. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
So, this is not your run of the mill case. [read post]
