Search for: "NO PARTY V. NO PARTY" Results 361 - 380 of 119,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That said, a plaintiff may recover treble damages if the defendant “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487 [1]; see Hansen v Caffry, 280 AD2d 704, 705 [3d Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 603 [2001]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:55 am by Frank Cranmer
Therefore, said the Court, “In fulfilling its duty to safeguard and promote the welfare of SE the Trust is obliged to ascertain and have regard to the wishes and feelings of SE, the mother, the foster carers and any other relevant party. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
This week sees the launch of the party manifestos in the UK general election and it will be interesting to see what media and legal policies are promised by the parties. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
Querino v Cambridge City Council (Rev1) (2024) EWCA Civ 314 We’re a bit late to this one. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
The SEC’s high-profile litigation against SolarWinds and its Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), Timothy Brown, reached a critical juncture on May 15, 2024, when the parties presented oral arguments before Judge Paul A. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
The SEC’s high-profile litigation against SolarWinds and its Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), Timothy Brown, reached a critical juncture on May 15, 2024, when the parties presented oral arguments before Judge Paul A. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
On Tuesday 4 June, the Chair of the UK Statistics Authority, Sir Robert Chote, wrote to leaders of political parties to ask that their parties and candidates use statistics appropriately and transparently. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:40 pm by Allan Blutstein
Proj. for Privacy & Surveillance Accountability v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
Cases where a party argues for no involvement at all (no indirect contact, no grant of PR / termination of it) are still few and far between – although I wonder if in recent years more parents observing a shift in attitudes towards domestic abuse have been emboldened to argue for no contact to abusive parents and removal or restriction of their PR[7]? [read post]