Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon" Results 361 - 380 of 1,509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What happens when the President simply thinks that he is not merely above the law but that, in Richard Nixon’s infamous words, “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal” at all? [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s unpublished book is the hottest manuscript in Washington. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm by NCC Staff
An Impeachment Trial Without Witnesses Would Be Unconstitutional By Paul Savoy, Former prosecutor, Manhattan District Attorney’s Office Paul Savoy contends that key legal precedents including Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Nixon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
He contrasts this rush to judgment with the Nixon proceedings, which ran for a year and a half, and the Clinton impeachment, which followed “years of investigation. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
With the House of Representatives set to pass the articles of impeachment to the Senate later today, Jan. 15, senators are still debating whether or not the president’s trial should involve hearing from witnesses. [read post]