Search for: "Novelty, Inc."
Results 361 - 380
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 10:00 pm
Mike’s Novelties, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment of infringement and no invalidity, but reversed the finding of willful infringement. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
Esab Group, Inc., 390 F.3d 1361, 1369 (Fed. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2013 N.Y. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:46 am
See also UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:40 pm
On Tuesday, the Fair Use Project, along with the good folks at Bingham McCutchen LLP and Virginia Rutledge, filed a brief amici curiae on behalf of the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc., and the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation in the Cariou v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:09 pm
” If a prior design has “the same” appearance, then the new design would be invalid for lack of novelty. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
(see e.g. point [1.1], above) and the proprietor also continued to identify Kennametal Inc. as opponent in its submissions.[1.5] Instructions were given by Kennametal Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
(I've picked these three from a dozen such examples in a presentation by James Peters, Vice-President of New Market Initiatives for LegalZoom.com, Inc.) [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Aeropostale, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Aeropostale, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
Novelty, Inc., 482 F.3d 910, 917 (7th Cir. 2007) ("[T]he very combination of these [unprotectable] elements as well as the expression that is [the work itself] are creative."); Bucklew v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
Unlike new and farmer varieties, protection of extant verities need not fulfill the criteria of ‘novelty’ [Sec. 15(1)]. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:24 pm
It reads, © 2010 Rhode Island Novelty, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:31 pm
In the reexamination proceeding itself, Appellant CW only challenged the novelty and non-obviousness of the claims. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 3:46 am
In Alexsam Inc. vs. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:43 am
” Refusing to dismiss the employee’s subsequent discrimination suit, the court found that her minor edit “manifested an intent to preserve her right to file a discrimination claim” (Allen v Chanel, Inc, SDNY June 4, 2013). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
The dispute was whether the machines offered “exclusively … noncash merchandise prizes, toys, or novelties, or a representation of value redeemable for those items. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:15 am
Defendant Omron Oilfield & Marine, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm
In Australia the patentability of such materials has recently been confirmed by the Federal Court of Australia in Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics Inc [2013] FCA 65 (15 February 2013)[3], see Vaughn Barlow, CIPA, March 2013, 122-123. [read post]
