Search for: "PHILLIPS v. PHILLIPS" Results 361 - 380 of 4,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2021, 6:55 am by Stewart Baker, Bryce Klehm
In the words of the Justice Department’s Criminal Resource Manual, in order to find someone guilty of violating the RICO statute under the “more expansive view” of U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:34 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Sentence modification — Justice Reinvestment Act On March 26, 2010, in the Circuit Court for Charles County, Delante Phillip Gray, appellant, pleaded guilty pursuant to a binding guilty plea agreement to distribution of a controlled dangerous substance (“CDS”) and admitted to violations of probation in two other cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Arkansas Law Review Examines the Lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm by Unknown
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2020-2021update.html Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 6/28/21:Phillips, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the cert petitions in the two denied cases, Phillips v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While counsel’s communications and statements surrounding the withdrawal of the action filed in New York, which we assume to be true on a CPLR 3211 (a)(7) motion, and defendants’ subsequent reliance on said withdrawal in a California action, are troubling, the complaint fails to allege damages proximately caused by the alleged deceit (see Doscher v Mannatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Lash starts his compilation with the greatest hits of any conventional founding-era edited volume:   the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, McCulloch v. [read post]