Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
The executive’s ever-present need to seek funding from Congress gives Congress leverage over agencies even when Senate filibusters or divided government make substantive statutory amendment unlikely. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:47 am
You are considering filing a motion to suppress the fentanyl under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:19 am
For example, a professor’s article in a campus publication yearning for the death of the college president was ruled protected by the First Amendment in Bauer v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent article in the Administrative Law Review, Christopher Slobogin, the Milton Underwood Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, discussed the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In an important 1961 article in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Alexander Bickel—who was a leading constitutional scholar of his generation—defended the Supreme Court’s exercise of what he called “the passive virtues. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
I doubt it, which is my second point. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am
" "Notre Dame Law School grants tenure to four professors," including the legal historian Christian Burset and the administrative law scholar Emily Brenner, who contributes to the history of that field (Notre Dame Law). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Hints of this objection appear throughout the dialectic in the second half of the book (where Loughlin discusses contemporary scholars, as opposed to the historical project of the early chapters). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Second, as my ICLE colleague Geoff Manne noted, there’s a conspicuous suggestion of quid pro quo and, what’s more, prejudgment of various complaints against Meta—or, at least, a conspiracy to prejudge such matters. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm
Whether they be cops, inspectors, or even state university professors (like the present author!) [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
This post is by Maggie Gardner, a professor of law at Cornell Law School. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
States will likely pass a patchwork of laws to regulate AI-generated images. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Second, it claims that Pitt, in assessing and imposing security costs, improperly took account of the number or likely actions of expected counter-protesters (among Pitt community members or outsiders), since imposition of security costs relating to such counter-protests confers a Heckler’s Veto over a student group’s choice of topics and speakers in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
LaCroix asks if the passage of the Eleventh Amendment is best described as “a moment of interposition. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
On 19 June 2023 Collins Rice J heard the second day of the application in the case of WFZ v BBC. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:14 pm
" Justice Barrett explains why: Second, even granting the broad principle the Court takes from Linda R. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:13 am
Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University - Washington College of Law, and Professor Lisa P. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
Law, appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. [read post]
