Search for: "Paine v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 11:18 pm
The case is DiCosolo v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:24 pm
In Baze v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 12:17 pm
Oklahoma and other States could... [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:31 am
However, a Houston Court of Appeals case styled Calderon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:30 am
27 June 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Court decided on The Saunders Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Additionally, the US Supreme Court denied a petition to hear McCutchen v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
In a recent post, we covered the Second District Court of Appeals' recent ruling in Jiminez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:16 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations,... [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:10 pm
Like its federal counterpart, Arizona Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or... [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
Like its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or... [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:38 pm
The case before the high Court, LeBron v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:45 pm
Walker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
The decision below: Rutherford and A Following the Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the claimants in Rutherford and A were (necessarily) at pains to show that their position was more closely analogous to Burnip v Birmingham City Council than to MA. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
McGraw v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm
We’ve just been informed of Phillips v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Ramos v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 11:27 pm
In the case of Lewis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:28 am
The Court of Appeals found that the underlying statute clearly and unambiguously stated that in banc review was to be conducted by "incumbent" judges, being those appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:18 am
Now, in Lee v. [read post]
