Search for: "Parker v. Downing" Results 361 - 380 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 10:51 am by Nathan
  The Heller decision affirmed, among other things, the Parker case which struck down a similar law. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:44 pm by Gabe Acevedo
As the press materials note, Zubulake is “the most famous plaintiff in the history of electronic discovery,” stemming from the Zubulake v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), PMA cases basically boil down to “parallel” violation claims. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
You have the sense there was no way the plaintiffs were going to win this one.The case is DeFabio v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am by Adam Chandler
Both SCOTUSblog and Bloomberg gear up for next Tuesday’s argument in the violent video games case, Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 11:15 am by Jeff Marshall
The cash that is converted to income is recouped with interest over time as annuity payments are made to the community spouse.My law partner, Matt Parker, was the attorney on the case, James v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:19 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Yesterday's Daily Journal had a story (no link available) by Laura Ernde on Monday's Supreme Court ruling in Clayworth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There was a problem with this arrest: 18 years earlier, the New York Court of Appeals struck down this law as unconstitutional, in People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"James Franco Shows Three Shorts in Palm Springs, Explains Career Plan" http://j.mp/dheaow copyrights & campaigns blog on "Viacom v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Dennis Crouch
The Court based this ruling on the definition of process in Section 100 of the Patent Act and its own precedents (from the 1970’s and 1981) in Gottschalk v Benson, Parker v Flook, and Diamond v Diehr. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" For past recycling of Lemley by Mullin, seehttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/04/joe-mullin-on-copying.htmlElsewhere, PatentHawk (Gary Odom) reminds us of Stevens' first case:The first case Justice Stevens authored was Parker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In likewise rejecting that claim the Court stated: "blight is an elastic concept that does not call for an inflexible, one-size-fits-all definition (see Berman v Parker, 348 US 26, 33-34 [1954]). [read post]