Search for: "People v. Nails" Results 361 - 380 of 546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2012, 9:56 pm by Jim Walker
 You will see that there have been many more than 16 people who die during cruises each year. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:16 am by David Lat & Elie Mystal
Nails will be provided in case you want to put up your o [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Of course, cases like this usually nail people on drug-trafficking charges, but the Fourth Amendment is often developed from cases involving people we would not touch with a 10-foot pole. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am by SHG
  Sure, a guy in his basement in Des Moines was easy enough to nail, but what of Dotcom in Auckland? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
This is a dilemma, because many people have an interest in USCIS decisions, and public comment is vital to the regulatory process. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
According to Mr Vaid, some might take the view that marketing is more important, or some might be afraid to annoy the local government, or they have not reserved enough budget to enforce their intellectual property rights.Mr Vaid summed up product categories in which Louis Vuitton is not active, but where people use the trademarked logo unauthorisedly: fake nails, rikshaws, tiles, a Romanian LV themed restaurant, bedsheets, iPhone caps, and condoms, see here. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:35 am by SHG
Not that it was a particularly difficult prediction, but he nailed it and deserves the credit.) [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:49 pm by Eric
Julep Nail Parlor Co., 2011 WL 5975054 (N.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:32 am by SHG
  There are a lot of logical fallacies, and most people use them regularly to make their points. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
Applying the law as it existed after Rivera's conviction became final in July 2004, we find that although evidence of “significantly heightened recklessness,” People v. [read post]