Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 361 - 380
of 25,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
We saw the same mindset in Kasky v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am
As part of the DMCA, Congress enacted a cause of action for people who send bogus copyright takedown notices, codified at 17 USC 512(f). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:23 pm
Indecent exposure in New York refers to the act of publicly exposing one’s private parts in a manner considered offensive or inappropriate. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
In many ways the most interesting part of the Court of Appeal judgment was the final section in which Thomas LJ posed two questions. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
SMUG v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
That is the part that has literally exhausted me.It is not just that the topic is complicated. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
Which is different than courts in some other jurisdictions.Its reasoning (in part):"Unlike the sales tax law and administration described in several of the cases from other jurisdictions, California law does not obligate a merchant to collect a sales tax from the customer. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 4:20 pm
I nonetheless had to laugh at the "Not so subtly" part. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
Carolos Bolanos did a lot of bad stuff, for which he was (for the most part) validly convicted. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:44 am
Here's how Justice Aronson concisely describes the facts of this particular case:"Respondent court denied petitioner’s section 170.6 motion because it concluded the motion was part of the Orange County District Attorney’s (district attorney) coordinated campaign to 'blanket paper' Judge Thomas Goethals to prevent him from hearing murder trials in retaliation for Judge Goethals’s rulings in three earlier murder cases. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 2:31 pm
It's an old, 90's style Honda -- the most commonly stolen vehicle in Sacramento (in part because it's just so darn easy to steal).He's convicted of four wobblers (i.e., misdemeanor/felonies): unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle (Veh. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
I'm still not certain that Justice Humes gets it right, but nonetheless think that the amendments definitely add some force to his conclusion.Second, as to the "burglary tools" part of the case, the Court of Appeal now reaches a different result than it did initially. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
And it's technically not part of the crime at all, which was done and over by the time the police found him.But Justice Lui persuasively argues -- to me, anyway -- that the video is relevant to refute defendant's story at trial that he attacked the victim because the victim was a drug-dealing child molester. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
If you think ROP is dignitary in part, maybe this works. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Our Fort Lauderdale defense attorneys know this was the core issue in People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:59 pm
In the recent case of Maloney v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:59 pm
In the recent case of Maloney v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 2:42 pm
CAIR, and Loomer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:27 am
The case, Sessions v. [read post]
