Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 361 - 380
of 26,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
" initial people in the opinion. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
You have to be a little, well, "different" when you threaten to kill people in an open and obvious way. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:01 pm
Nonetheless, I couldn't help feeling that a lot of this insanity was caused by something that might make many people go off the deep end as well: the perceived loss of a child. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
But I do think she knew it was "wrong" to spit at other people and to kick them in the stomach? [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
So there's no more conviction.Now, the Court of Appeal understandably says: "Well, maybe there's a dismissal, but there was still that initial conviction. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:32 am
In R v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
In both criminal cases as well as in civil cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
The Court of Appeal demonstrates its cultural awareness as well:"Defendants . . . . contend the measure summary and impartial analysis that appeared in the ballot pamphlet materials for Proposition D described the ordinance as authorizing delivery of medical marijuana by vehicles and they maintain that the voters enacting the proposition adopted that construction. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:02 am
Works every time.As I said, it may well be that Rosalinda has some serious problems. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:30 pm
That's an amorphous and essentially unreviewable category, as well as an attribution that's historically been differentially directed towards African-Americans (e.g., calling someone "uppity").So when Justice McConnell doesn't think that explanation for striking the juror flies, I can potentially get behind that.But this particular juror disclosed that she had two prior felony convictions. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:34 am
The month of November did not start out well for Howard K. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
(Which I remember well, as I was 10 at the time. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 12:45 pm
According to the Court of Appeal: a distinction without a difference.)Well done, 62-year old victim Dennis N. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:07 pm
He had ready access to other knives as well. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
It's for the judiciary to say whether "arguable but unmeritorious" issues should be raised, as well as to interpret what we exactly mean by that.And that's exactly what the California Supreme Court should do. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
That's how the opinion reads, as well as a press release from the DA's office at the time. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
But here, the trial court lets defendant plead guilty to a misdemeanor -- although the prosecution, which had filed felony charges, opposes such relief -- because if he pleads guilty to a felony, under his contract with Subway, he may well lose his Subway stores.God forbid we should deprive you of the instrumentality of your crimes, eh? [read post]
