Search for: "People v. Wilson" Results 361 - 380 of 1,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson blog had a post “ICO hands down its first fine under the GDPR”. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
However performance in Simulated Client exercises DO predict this Simulated clients, who are lay people, are DISRUPTIVE, demonstrating the “cognitive poverty of conventional law school assessment. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 5:07 am by INFORRM
Wilson ruled that Mr Unsworth was not a “limited purpose public figure” (see Unsworth v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am by Gordon Ahl
.: The Wilson Center will host an event on the challenges facing Europe in the horn of Africa. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 3:54 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Wilson dismissed that assertion and is allowing the case to move forward with Unsworth classified as a private citizen. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:31 am
Frierson (1991) 53 Cal.3d 730, 740, 742), as may one made four days before trial is to begin (People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:58 am by Bob Kraft
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Some of those very people, however, said Esposito’s claims are greatly embellished, or simply not true. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
If you think of a “legal” doctrine as a rule according to which people adhere their behavior and pursuant to which parties can resolve disputes, executive privilege has not been a legal doctrine at all. [read post]