Search for: "Points v. Points" Results 361 - 380 of 90,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2014, 7:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
And Tabarrok’s argument is that we’re at the wrong point on the curve.On images of invention, note the post related to Apple v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:53 pm by Tom Smith
The Supreme Court will soon reconsider the decision in Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:23 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court heard oral arguments in Heffernan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm by Rick Hasen
Court, remedial action by this court, or future action by the Legislature.’ Order (Doc. 528) at 14 (Smith, J., dissenting), Perez, et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm by Nigel Stacey
The first person to notice the vessel near the Marine Protected Area of Point Reyes was a ranger at the Point Reyes National Seashore. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:47 am by traceydennis
Regina v Dunn [2010] EWCA Crim 1823; [2010] WLR (D) 207 “The fact that an appeal from the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division only lay to the Supreme Court if the Court of Appeal certified that a point of law of general public importance was involved in its decision did not amount to a denial of the essence of an appellant’s right of access to the Supreme Court and was not incompatible with articles 6 and 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and… [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) This morning I appeared on the NPR radio program “On Point with Tom Ashbrook” to discuss the Supreme Court’s recent 5-4 Fourth Amendment case on strip searches, Florence v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 7:09 am by J
Two years is as good a starting point as any. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:45 am by Tom Smith
That seems like a pretty good talking point to me. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:35 am by Ruth Cowley and Stuart Neely (UK)
A new briefing note concerning the case of Lungowe v Vedanta appeal highlighting important points regarding parent company liability is now available. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am by SHG
Nor was Brennan, although he was both able and influential, as indeed was Stevens—until he wrote a ridiculous opinion in Clinton v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
In today’s costs judgment in MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 139 the Court of Appeal, applying the general rules on costs, declined to award costs to the defendants, which had ultimately prevailed on a question of obviousness, because they had raised so many issues on which they lost. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:37 pm
A recent California appellate decision, Blankenship v Allstate Insurance points out one of those traps which deals with the statute of limitations. [read post]