Search for: "RE v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 40,066
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
While the bill’s authors may have had in mind those who first arrive in the United States on parole, however, the language of the bill is broad enough to cover those who use advance parole to leave and re-enter the United States while they have a pending application for an immigration benefit, most commonly an application for adjustment of status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident (green card holder). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am
McCarthy’s has a good primer on the Court of Appeal decision, if you’re interested.🏳️⚧️ Alberta is applying to intervene in the pronoun litigation headed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Switzerland case concerned a group of older Swiss women; the territorially and substantively ambitious Duarte Agostinho v. 32 Member States was brought by six Portuguese children and young people; and Carême v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As SCOTUS explained in Sec'y of State of Md. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
” In re Lowry, 138 N.Y.S.3d at 241-2. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm
” (See Ray v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that the existing statute -- Section 8003 -- only bars candidates from running for multiple offices in the same election if they're running as independents, not if they're running (as here) in a primary election. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
We’re even seeing state agencies attempt to use the CIA’s non-response to circumvent local public records requests. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In last year's landmark affirmative action case, SFFA v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Further, their manager stated they do not remove this section of the machine during cleaning. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:34 am
In H.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
” Nicholson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm
The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 10:13 am
JustAnswer; Long v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
