Search for: "Robert Powers" Results 361 - 380 of 16,291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”If the Court really prized unanimity, and if Roberts had done his job, the opinion would have stopped there. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:05 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
” The power ballad was nominated for best original song and is performed by Gosling in the film. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm by Ilya Somin
" In a per curiam opinion jointly authored by five justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court ruled that only Congress, acting through legislation, has the power to determine who is disqualified and under what procedures. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
The Court held that states, such as Colorado, do not have the power to enforce this provision because the Constitution gives Congress that authority. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Anderson is a per curiam decision, which means we do not know the author, and, although I shouldn't speculate, it reads in some respects like the voice of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
Anderson is a per curiam decision, which means we do not know the author, and, although I shouldn't speculate, it reads in some respects like the voice of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But as a matter of historical record, legislation, police power, and even military power have produced deeper voting rights gains than court rulings. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am by Eric Segall
The case also dramatically limited Congress's powers to hold states liable for violations of federal law. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during February 2024 Nine consistory court judgments were circulated in 2024 including:  Procedure Churchyards and burials Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Also included are: Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; Visitations; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Sebelius, Chief Justice Roberts explained why the Commerce Clause power did not support the individual mandate as a predicate to explain why the law could be saved under the taxing power. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
”According to the respondents, Section 3 applies to the for-mer President because after taking the Presidential oath in2017, he intentionally incited the breaching of the Capitolon January 6 in order to retain power. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Christine Bartholomew
But Rapallo makes a compelling case from a somewhat surprising starting point: separation of powers. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:54 am by Tom Smith
And the elephant in the room: If Trump is reelected, he will have the power to dismiss all federal charges against him, and justice delayed will surely be justice denied. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:17 am by Beatrice Yahia
“This is called genocide and is reminiscent of the Holocaust even if the world powers do not like to recognize it,” he said in a post on X, adding, “The world must block Netanyahu. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Seek to Curb Utility Spending on Politics, Ads and More Extras Arkansas Advocate – Robert Zullo | Published: 2/27/2024 After a string of scandals and amid rising bills, lawmakers in statehouses across the country have been pushing legislation to curb utilities spending ratepayer money on lobbying, expert testimony in rate cases, goodwill advertising, charitable giving, trade association memberships, and other costs. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:17 am by Guest Author
Finally, the “hybrid approach” applied by Chief Justice Roberts combines elements of the clear statement and contextual approaches; its contours are less defined. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm by Ronald Mann
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch spent a great deal of time exploring that topic during Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart’s argument for the government. [read post]