Search for: "SCOTUS RULING"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
Jacobsen: SCOTUS should review Montana class-action dodge is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Below is a rough summary of what I intend to say.How seriously, if it all, the Court takes its own precedent is a vitally important question because if the Supreme Court reverses its own cases too frequently, people can sensibly question whether we are governed by the rule of law or the rule of justices. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
The case, Schuette vs Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, was a big win for Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette.In announcing the SCOTUS decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy insisted the High Court was not ruling substantively on the race issue but rather, only on whether courts have the authority to "disempower" voters from making decisions on such substantive, and admittedly divisive, issues. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:07 pm
SCOTUS handed down its opinion [pdf] in James v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
Poll: When Will the SEC Adopt Say-on-Pay Rules? [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 6:42 am
The SCOTUS ruling prompted state courts, now including Texas, to reconsider their old juvie LWOP sentences, and the results have been all over the map. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Speaking of jury trials – or rather, the lack of them – today is the day that the SCOTUS will hear arguments in SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:03 am
The Scotus Wiki page is here, with complete briefing.At SCOTUS Blog, Lyle Denniston files, "Court rejects DNA access claim. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 8:02 am
What SCOTUS should be doing Solving the SCOTUS docket mystery [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
It looks like the SCOTUS’s invitation to litigate this issue has been accepted. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:28 am
AP reports that one of the new rules is that pro pers may no longer argue (see new rule 28.8 ["Oral arguments may be presented only by members of the Bar of this Court."]). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:56 am
A ruling that upheld California's ban would be a setback for gay marriage proponents in the nation's largest state, although it would leave open the state-by-state effort to allow gays and lesbians to marry. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:00 pm
Some recent related posts: Solving the SCOTUS docket mystery What SCOTUS should be doing Slow-poke SCOTUS: a sign of division? [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am
Rule 10 of the Supreme Court Rules, which sets forth the types of cert petitions the court will grant, speaks first about federal courts, particularly cases raising a circuit split or federal question. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:57 pm
The post Philosopher Kings to Rule on Ten Commandments appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:36 pm
Amy Howe at SCOTUS Blog has must-read commentary on the three Texas death penalty rulings issued by the Supreme Court earlier today. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:44 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled today in, Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 12:44 am
I'd expressed concern that the new SCOTUS precedent from the Herring case decided this week - which says that the exclusionary rule does not apply to negligent errors by the police - will make the problem of rights violations based on database errors even harder to solve. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:25 pm
This ruling puts to rest a long running dispute over whether there is federal preemption for medical device product liability lawsuits, but may have opened the way for an even longer dispute on the scope of that preemption.Affirming the Second Circuit, the Supreme Court held that FDA premarket approval of a medical device under the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, 21 U.S.C. [read post]
