Search for: "SHAW V. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 1,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm by Howard Knopf
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Kathy Darvil
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm by Anita Earls
The biggest elephant in the room here is the fact that the 2016 congressional redistricting plan enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly as a remedy for the Shaw v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
The general rule that the Supreme Court established in 1993 in yet another North Carolina case, Shaw v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
But almost immediately after the start of that regime, beginning with the Shaw v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We have said that an “IPR does not begin until it is instituted,” Shaw Indus. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
***Seyfarth Shaw's Trading Secrets blog has an excellent summary of the trade-secret status afforded customer lists. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:52 am by Staci Zaretsky
Perhaps he ought to take another look at Clinton v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 9:17 pm
Shaw, Third-party funding in investment arbitration: how non-disclosure can cause harm for the sake of profit Fan Yang, The proper law of the arbitration agreement: Mainland Chinese and English law compared Case NotesBlake Primrose, Separability and stage one of the Sulamérica inquiry Francisco González de Cossío, Mexico’s fantastic three: a pro-arbitration trilogy Kwadwo Sarkodie & Joseph Otoo, Getma v Republic of Guinea—implications for… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
An Oklahoma jury has ordered a former state legislator to pay $4.3 million to an insurance company in a defamation case. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]