Search for: "STATE v RANDALL"
Results 361 - 380
of 682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 2:24 pm
See Richardson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am
The suit, Mesa Water, L.P. and G&J Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:00 am
Additionally, its hard to see where a case like this fits within juvenile 8th Amendment cases such as Roper v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:06 am
Randall Jones, No. 95,654 (Mitchell)Direct appeal; manufactureRandall L. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:35 am
Marshall v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:21 pm
Randall and Whitney in 1795. . . . [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 7:40 pm
That case is Ronald Sanders, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am
” At the NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen analyzes the recent summary decision in Mullenix v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
V for victory sign introduced. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
Perhaps the most challenging expression of this tension was set out by the always engaging and challenging Chief Judge Randall Rader, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Accordingly, in the absence of a prohibition in statutory or decisional law, or countervailing public policy, provisions which relate to the use of preferences in the promotion of unit members based on examination scores concern a term or condition of employment and thus are a proper subject for collective bargaining and subsequent resolution of disputes through contract arbitration procedures.* Randall comments: The decision states that the appointment of the PCTEA unit member… [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:09 pm
Attorney for Washington; David Joley of Fort Wayne, IN. 9:45 AM - Randall Wagler v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:19 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
Randall Comments: The Munger case appears to be another example of a public employer participating in the New York State Health Insurance Program attempting to circumvent the mandates of Civil Service Law §167-a* A brief review of the genesis of §167-a may be illuminating. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:30 pm
Davison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:30 pm
Davison v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 10:38 am
In Tennessee v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
