Search for: "SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION 13"
Results 361 - 380
of 976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
” Id. at **13-14. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Justice Thomas wrote the opinion for a 9-0 Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
That opinion, by the way, was the last time the Court used the F-word (as opposed to “the F-word”) in an opinion. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
In this case, the trial judge found that the Applicant, while employed as a vehicle field representative on September 13, 2011, and on a continuous trauma basis for the period September 13, 2010 to September 13, 2011, suffered injuries to her cervical spine (C5-C6 fusion surgery), upper extremities, and left shoulder resulting in 100% permanent total disability. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
" Complaint at para. 13. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
On January 16, 2008, Baker supplemented his May 31, 2007 motion, filing a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 59(e). [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:03 pm
Sept. 13, 2022). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
There were two problems with this "supplemental" report. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:27 pm
” The errata pages were only discovered later, and the Court asked for supplemental submissions. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
Faulkner did not supplement his initial disclosures following Johnson's appearance. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 13, 2008 N. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
Jul. 28, 2009), read opinion here. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:20 am
Jul. 28, 2009), read opinion here. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:11 pm
The Eleventh Circuit opinion suggested that a supplemental notice should have been issued regarding this development. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:11 am
I would like to write a blog post that reports on the opinion of eDiscovery thought leaders. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
The same thought apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs 49 to 51 and 77 of the judgment of 6 November 2014 in Vans v OHIM (Representation of a wavy line), T‑53/13, also invoked by K-Swiss. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Lee, No. 13-10517 (9thCir. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:00 am
They may have even tried to win over public opinion as modern Robin Hoods, or courted favor with local or high-up government officials. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:16 pm
Rea, Case No. 1:13-cv-328 (GBL/IDD) (E.D. [read post]
