Search for: "Schneider v. Schneider" Results 361 - 380 of 656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2020, 8:25 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Amanda Tyler compared this ruling to Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 11:38 am by Andres
Axel Metzger, pp.177-206 | HTML | PDF | Comparative Analysis of copyright assignment and licence formalities for Open Source Contributor Agreements Andres Guadamuz and Andrew Rens, pp.207-230 | HTML | PDF | Reviewed Articles Governance, Social Media and The Cybercitizen – Always in Motion is the FutureAndrew Power, pp.231-245 | HTML | PDF | The European Unified Patent Court: Assessment and Implications of the Federalisation of the Patent System in EuropeDimitris Xenos, pp.246-277 | HTML | PDF… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘An attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate cause of a plaintiff’s damages if but for the attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action, or would not have sustained actual and ascertainable damages'” (Nill v Schneider, 173 AD3d 753, 755, quoting Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50). [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:40 am by Law Lady
Supreme Court today, for the first time, will consider what is the correct test in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to defendants’ contention, plaintiff, as the personal representative of decedent’s estate, may bring a claim for legal malpractice alleging that defendants were negligent in the estate planning for decedent (see Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309-310 [2010]). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:43 am by Paul F. Prestia
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit came to the same conclusion, regarding intrinsic versus extrinsic evidence, in its 2005 Phillips v. [read post]