Search for: "Settle v. State of California"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 1:17 am
Right now, California state courts won't enforce a non-compete agreement between an employer and employee absent equal bargaining power or payment for the agreement. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:22 am
Berner Issuing its decision in the long-pending Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 am
In Bernal v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:44 pm
As such, the California Supreme Court should take it up. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Many of the muni bond derivative defendants have reached settlements with state AGs, rather than settling in the class action. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 2:32 pm
In a recent court of appeal decision (Kim v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:47 am
In that case, the parties settled state and federal wage and hour claims involving claimed missed rest periods for a total of just short of $350,000. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:54 am
LEXIS 13743 (December 11, 2008): To accept the Attorney General's argument would be to depart from settled California and federal precedent requiring particularized suspicion. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 9:20 am
Most states too have their own laws that prohibit disability discrimination. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am
The Jenpoo, Kuoch and Ma cases appear to have settled. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm
In the first, the en banc panel settles a question about what "clearly established federal law" governs a claim, and rules in favor of a California state prisoner. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
The Northern District of California had found U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 11:33 pm
In Myspace v. [read post]
FTC and California AG Join in Challenging Reverse Payment Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry
6 Mar 2009, 7:03 am
Trade Comm'n et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 12:14 am
Make me look bad, California Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
According to the majority, the substantial nexus requirement is closely related to the due process minimum contacts requirement and that it is well settled that a business need not have a physical presence to satisfy the due process requirement. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
” The lawsuit is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:30 am
Wang v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:19 am
Harrington v. [read post]
