Search for: "Simmons v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
Rev. 743, 752-53 (2005); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
Davon Simmons, 2012BX059103, NYLJ 1202631915888, at *1 (Crim. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:57 am
Kennedy referred in Roper v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 10:01 am
The verdict, both as to liability and the amount of damages, has now been affirmed in Simmons v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
” Panellists were Claudia Tapia Garcia (Blackberry), Dieter Kamlah (Taylor Wessing) and Kevin Mooney fr (Simmons & Simmons, also Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the rules of procedure of the UPC). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
Jackson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
Id. at 1167–68 (quoting from and relying on Simmons v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
(See Ford v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002) (No U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
The event began with an overview of the unitary patent and unified patent court system by Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons) who has been serving on the Drafting Committee of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
Simmons (ending the juvenile death penalty) and Graham v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court in the case of Roper v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:38 am
Simmons. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
