Search for: "Small v. Going Forward, Inc."
Results 361 - 380
of 439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
” (Quoting Banning Ranch, 211 Cal.App.4th at 1223, and citing as example Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
Don't go away mad, just go away. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If the public doesn’t think the system is fair, at a minimum, they are not going to invest their hard-earned money. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
Later in my cross-examination, I was inquiring about another study that reported a statistic from a small sample. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
The answer is really quite simple: the plaintiffs' cases should go forward. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
But PLAL practically gives medical monitoring the ALI seal of approval - six different illustrations and two pages (small print) of Reporters' Notes, all without a any acknowledgement anywhere that the existence, vel non (fancy legal Latin for "or not"), of the cause of action itself is quite questionable.So, after all has been said and done, our basic beef with PLAL remains pretty much the same as it's always been. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
“When you’re dealing with something as critical as news is to a democracy, you need to ensure, certainly, that it’s independent, but also that it’s vibrant going forward,” he said. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
Before I go on, I want to make one thing very clear. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[x] The court cautioned that, unless there was “a substantial likelihood that the disclosure of the omitted fact would have been viewed by the reasonable investor as having significantly altered the `total mix’ of information made available,” [xi] proposed disclosure-only settlements and accompanying attorney’s fees would not be approved going forward by the Chancery Court. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Let’s go! [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
” The report suggests these concerns may derive from three different qualities of sustainable business information and reporting: control v. influence; quantitative v. qualitative; and historical v. forward-looking. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Citigroup Appeal As we have discussed previously, Judge Rakoff's decision last November to reject the SEC's "neither-admit-nor-deny" settlement with Citigroup could result in a significant shift in the way the SEC, defendants and the Courts look at settlements going forward. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decision, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
