Search for: "State Court of Clayton County" Results 361 - 380 of 641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am by becassidy
Clayton County, Georgia (Consolidated with Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Clayton County, Georgia, Gerald Bostock alleges that his former employer fired him because of his sexual orientation. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
Clayton County, Georgia, Respondent (United States Supreme Court)FINRA Fines/Suspends Rep Over Mismarked "Solicitation. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 8:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
Clayton County Continue reading The post SCOTUS Watch: Significant Employment Decisions on the Horizon appeared first on New Jersey Employment Lawyers Blog. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Attorney General Josh Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Keith Clayton, for the State-Appellee. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:10 pm by Doug Cornelius
Background Memo from House Staff The Honorable Jay Clayton TestimonyThe Honorable Robert J. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Clayton County, Georgia, in which the court will decide whether federal whether federal law protects employees from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, “will tackle a central irony in the fight over gay rights[:] Even though the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in 2015, gay people can still be fired from their jobs in much of the country,” because “[l]ower courts are split on whether federal law permits… [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
Clayton County, Georgia Espinoza and Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Clayton County, Georgia. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 11:30 am by William Eskridge
The Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected Clayton County’s class-based argument in the race context. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:30 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Clayton County, Georgia, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that Title VII does not apply to discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Absent meaningful legislative reform, the task of reform fell largely to courts, and some frustrated developers began to fight CEQA litigation abuses with novel litigation of their own, now brought under the Supreme Law of the land in United States courts . [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Clayton County, Georgia This issue in Zarda and Bostock is whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]