Search for: "State v. Ali" Results 361 - 380 of 1,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
Furthermore, the Abu Ali case provided an example of how a witness deposition could be conducted remotely, suggesting that al-Darbi could be deposed again for trial even from Saudi Arabia. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am by Mary B. McCord
  And he deplored as “wrong-headed” the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
There was considerable force in the executive’s counterpoint that the general application of the Ali criteria will require assessing undisputed factual matters which can be proved without the appellant’s direct evidence. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen notes that in Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am by AYESHA CHRISTIE, MATRIX
In line with his earlier judgment in Hesham Ali (case comment here), Lord Reed rejected the Secretary of State’s submissions that in cases of non-settled migrants, the question is whether the state owed them a positive obligation to grant leave to remain, rather than whether there had been an interference with art 8 which could be justified. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Speaking at the press conference, Trump reaffirmed Article V of NATO, committing the United States to the alliance’s promise of collective self-defense. [read post]