Search for: "State v. C. A."
Results 361 - 380
of 39,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
At oral argument in the Texas state prisoner’s federal habeas case Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
“The Twisted Career of the term ‘Liberty Interest’ Gets Twistier Still in Dep’t of State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm
We first happened upon Loreto v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:54 am
I v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (Case C-348/09); [2012] WLR (D) 157 “An individual who had committed an offence, including those referred to in article 83(1)FEU of the FEU Treaty, such as the sexual exploitation of children, could be regarded as constituting a particularly serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society and therefore could be excluded from a host member state on ‘imperative ground[s] of public security’… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:19 pm
§ 1962(c), must have a "structure," but it need not be, as Boyle sought the jury to be instructed in his bank robberies case, "an ascertainable structure beyond that inherent in the pattern of racketeering activity in which it engages. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 1:55 pm
The article traces the impact of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-212/97 Centros Ltd v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:19 am
On June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:42 am
United States, SCOTUSBlog here, opinion below here. [read post]
16 May 2010, 1:07 pm
The county stated it kept Class C prisoners for 3,085 “jail days” last year. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:41 am
Registration of the earlier trade mark in the member state concerned did not constitute a prerequisite for the running of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence prescribed in article 9(1).” (Case C-482/09); [2011] WLR (D) 279 WLR Daily, 22nd September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:55 am
Benjamin C. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:50 am
Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 N.Y.3d 302John Park, a police officer employed by the Town of Greenburgh, underwent surgery in June 2002 after sustaining an injury in the line of duty. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:51 am
(C) Game wardens. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted… [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently addressed the parameters of this right in State v. [read post]
