Search for: "State v. D. H."
Results 361 - 380
of 3,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Beck, No. 5:06-CT-3018-H, 2006 WL3914717 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:33 am
CR 15-07-H-DWM, 2015 WL 7720480 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Tharp, Jr., in N.B., et. al., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 5:51 pm
”]” “Goff v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Given the Gallagher et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Given the Gallagher et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:20 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:18 pm
Sutton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
"In Council 82, v State of New York, 255 A.D.2d 54, aff'd. 94 NY2d at 329, New York courts held that a Department's rule does not trump an employee's First Amendment rights. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:07 am
” … [H]ere, Alexander cited to “a specific statement of law” that was drawn from R.C. 1702.80(D). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
The European Union, pursuant to the Treaty on European Union, and the United States of America shall ensure that the provisions of this Agreement are applied in relation to bilateral extradition treaties between the Member States and the United States of America, in force at the time of the entry into force of this Agreement, under the following terms: (a) Article 4 shall be applied in place of bilateral treaty provisions that authorize extradition exclusively with respect… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:40 pm
Matter of R-D-, 24 I&N Dec. 221 (BIA 2007). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:23 pm
Code § 1301:6-3-01(L) exempts from the definition of the term “investment adviser” any person who “during the course of the preceding twelve months: (a) [h]as had fewer than fifteen clients; (b) [d]oes not hold himself out generally to the public as an investment adviser; and (c) [h]as clients consisting solely of… “[a]ccredited investors” as defined in… Regulation D…”… [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 7:20 am
The latter of these regulations were challenged, and considered by the Supreme Court in UARG v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:58 pm
Hess, H. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
In Iowa, if the obstruction occurs during a riot, the offense becomes a Class D felony and the maximum penalty increases to five years in prison and a $7,500 fine. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
The shameful Court of Appeals precedent is Matter of Alison D. v. [read post]
