Search for: "State v. Dam" Results 361 - 380 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
There is perhaps no region of the world more important than the Northern Triangle and Mexico in terms of the impact of corruption on the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:58 am by administrator
[v] The ABA’s Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System are available at http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/legalservices/downloads/sclaid/indigentdefense/tenprinciplesbooklet.pdf. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:39 am by V.Venkatesan
(All this comes from Shubhankar Dam's informative two part article on the topic in the Daily News, Pakistan). [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:24 am
Such claims for compensation are fostered by the 1992 decision, Lucas v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:44 am
The Clean Energy Act adds the following new and proposed projects to the list of protected heritage assets: the Waneta dam and generating facility, Site C, Mica Dam expansion, Revelstoke Dam expansion, and Northwest Transmission Line. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:34 am by Dianne Saxe
As described by Justice La Forest in Friends of the Oldman River v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:44 am
The Clean Energy Act adds the following new and proposed projects to the list of protected heritage assets: the Waneta dam and generating facility, Site C, Mica Dam expansion, Revelstoke Dam expansion, and Northwest Transmission Line. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:34 am by Dianne Saxe
As described by Justice La Forest in Friends of the Oldman River v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:34 am by Dianne Saxe
As described by Justice La Forest in Friends of the Oldman River v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am by Henning Lahmann
This principle is applicable not only when the actual damage is caused by a third actor—another state or a non-state group, as in the two cited cases—but also when the damage is caused by “some natural event such as a flood” that the responsible state had the duty to prevent from occurring (for example, by maintaining a dam; ILC Commentary, Article 31). [read post]