Search for: "State v. Epstein" Results 361 - 380 of 683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
While employers may find the bevy of federal, state, and local anti-harassment laws overwhelming, Epstein Becker & Green’s Halting Harassment® program is 50-state compliant and designed to help employers ensure compliance. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice and the defendants were entitled to dismissal of that cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909; Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d at 728). [read post]
Please reach out to an attorney at Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., to ensure compliance with the unique requirements of your state. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 5:52 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Epstein stated: I am aware of the electrodiagnostic abnormalities that have been determined. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
With regards to the allegation of uncertainty, Arnold LJ applied the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Anan Kasei v Neo. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 3:50 pm
In essence, that would be to undo virtually the entire modern “regulatory state. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:35 pm
Epstein testified that the TMJ injury is likely to improve with continued treatment. [read post]