Search for: "State v. Hodges"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Put differently, an inventive step (a necessary component for being able to patent something) cannot include something that is 'obvious' to a person skilled in the art, having considered anything that forms the state of the art in which they are skilled in.Typically the courts follow two tests on determining obviousness; (i) the Windsurfing/Pozzolli structure; and (ii) the EPO's problem-and-solution method.The question of obviousness, as set out in Conor Medsystems Inc… [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Hodges prohibitions on same-sex marriage. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Hodges, he excoriated at length the Lochner decision itself, its activist embrace of “courts . . . substitut[ing] their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies . . . [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:00 am
Jennifer Elisa Chapman, University of Maryland Thurgood Marshall Law Library, has posted United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
Hodges, where Justice Roberts was not swayed by “social policy and considerations of fairness,” and instead concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment does not require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
The Hodge court concluded otherwise, stating “the UCL provides only for equitable remedies,” “[d]amages are not available. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 6:01 am
Alyssa Kempf f/k/a Alyssa Hodge and Geico County Mutual Insurance Company. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
In her scholarly paper, Professor Hodges proposes instituting a negotiation or bargaining requirement into employment contracts in order to protect employee rights in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s recent Epic Systems v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Frances Denney, a trainee patent attorney, comment on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Actavis Group PTC EHF and Ors v ICOS Corporation and Anor [2019] UKSC 15. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:22 am
The Court of Appeal, in overturning Mr Justice Birss' decision, found the patent invalid for lack of inventive step (Actavis v ICOS [2017] EWCA Civ 1671). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:28 am
Brian Cordery and Claire Phipps-JonesThe UK Supreme Court today handed down its decision in Actavis v ICOS. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Giving the leading judgment, Lord Kerr (with whom Lady Hale, Lord Hodge and Lady Black agreed) allowed the appeal on the basis that there had been a breach of the investigative obligation under ECHR, art 2. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Gubeladze, heard 12-13 Mar 2019. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:10 am
The Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
In the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
