Search for: "State v. Humphrey"
Results 361 - 380
of 500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Humphrey bars her retaliation claim. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Francisco acknowledged that the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Humphrey, 14-8349, two relists after arrival of the record before it won its grant. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 9:36 am
Beck gave a CLE presentation to the Lubbock Area Bar Association titled “United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
That sturdy precedent was the Court’s decision in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
Humphrey’s article “Let’s Talk About Sex”: Legislating and Educating on the Affirmative Consent Standard is cited in the following article: Ruthy Lowenstein Lazar, Epistemic Twilight Zone of Consent, 30 S. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
This modest slap on the wrist is strong evidence that the current conservative Justices will not take on the constitutional status of independent agencies, which were accepted in Humphrey’s Executor v, United States (1935), even though these could be challenged on the ground that the so-called “fourth branch” of government does not fit into the tripartite constitutional structure with its legislative, executive, and judicial branches. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
The Tax Court found this approach sensible in Humphrey v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Acevedo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
News In Slosberg v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
Tipaldo, minimum-wage laws on the books in a third of the states, in some cases, for decades. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Touchstone Television Productions v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349 (second post-record relist), asks whether the “Georgia courts err[ed] in failing to recognize race discrimination under Batson in the extraordinary circumstances of this death penalty case. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Humphrey, 14-8349, had six boxes of record arrive on the same day and likewise was relisted a second time. [read post]
