Search for: "State v. Staggers"
Results 361 - 380
of 733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
Supreme Court’s June 29, 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
That number is staggering. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
”, invoking the aftermath of Worcester v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm
” Barr v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:42 pm
Courts in 1953 in Halean v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:59 pm
Courts in 1953 in Halean v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:51 am
Although June Medical v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
It's only an intermediate appellate court decision, but the implications are staggering. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Georgia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent non-precedential decision in the case of Coughlin v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm
Id. at 18 (citing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:29 am
The presentation canvassed a series of issues in the debate regarding appropriate responses, including: state v. federal responses; private ordering v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:30 am
In the seminal case of State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 6:26 am
In a recent Maryland case, Harding v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:19 am
See Washington v. [read post]
