Search for: "State v. Taylor E."
Results 361 - 380
of 720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
The judge states that “What is concerning about this case is that the continued litigation is proving to cause stress, anxiety, upset and confusion to B. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:27 am
") AC35133 - Taylor v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
Code § 1030(e)(8). [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:54 am
Additionally, the employee’s FMLA claim failed because she was not denied any rights under the Act (Taylor-Novotny v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Bankrupt Sapphire Glass Supplier Reveals New Details Of Its Disturbing Relationship With Apple http://t.co/A28LdHO9Gp -> Taylor Swift and the Myth of the Mean Greedy Artist | Electric Literature http://t.co/6lzISXcAoF -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-07: Taylor Swift left Spotify because we stopped valuing… http://t.co/fapyeGOA6G -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-07 http://t.co/pENaPSQRQZ -> Computer and… [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
" A spot of sparring in the States. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Marie-Andrée tells how it went. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
Via Katfriend and occasional contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing) we have now heard the fate of that case from his colleague Anja Lunze (katpat!). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
” The Appellate Division ruled that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement agreement: intoxication on the job.________________________ The Discipline Book, - A concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State set out in a 2100+ page e-book. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 409, 120 S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
Taylor was in command of F Barracks. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:22 am
Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
’ Coolidge v. [read post]
